Mechanical Thrombectomy in Subtypes of Basilar Artery Occlusion: Relationship to Recanalization Rate and Clinical Outcome
- 1 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 291 (3), 730-737
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019181924
Abstract
Background Acute stroke because of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) represents 1% of all ischemic strokes. However, recanalization rates and treatment outcome for the different pathologic subtypes of BAO stroke are not fully understood. Purpose To compare the recanalization rate and clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in different subtypes of BAO. Materials and Methods Eighty-two patients (46 men and 36 women; mean age, 73 years; age range, 20–90 years; mean age in men, 70 years [age range, 20–90 years]; mean age in women, 75 years [age range; 61–90 years]) with acute BAO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between March 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups: embolism without vertebral artery (VA) steno-occlusion (group 1), embolism from tandem VA steno-occlusion (group 2), and in situ atherosclerotic thrombosis (group 3). Clinical and angiographic characteristics, recanalization rate, procedure times, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups by using the Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson χ2, and Fisher exact tests. Results The incidence of BAO according to stroke mechanism were as follows: group 1, n = 34 (41%); group 2, n = 28 (34%), group 3, n = 20 (24%). Overall, successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b or 3) was achieved in 78% (64 of 82) and favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) in 37% (30 of 82) of the patients. The procedure time was shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (49 vs 66 minutes, respectively; P = .01). Group 1 showed a higher successful recanalization rate than group 3 (29 of 34 [85%] vs 11 of 20 [55%], respectively; P = .01). Good clinical outcome rate was higher in group 1 than in group 3 (18 of 34 [53%] vs four of 20 [20%], respectively; P = .02). Conclusion The outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion differs according to the pathologic mechanism of stroke; the best outcomes and recanalization rate occurred in patients with embolism without vertebral artery steno-occlusion. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Hetts in this issue.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy after Intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA Alone in StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Thrombectomy within 8 Hours after Symptom Onset in Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Perfusion-Imaging SelectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: The ENDOSTROKE studyAnnals of Neurology, 2014
- Basilar artery occlusionLancet Neurology, 2011
- Significance of Large Vessel Intracranial Occlusion Causing Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIAStroke, 2009
- Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry studyThe Lancet Neurology, 2009
- New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation Stroke Registry: I. Methods, Data Base, Distribution of Brain Lesions, Stroke Mechanisms, and OutcomesJournal of Clinical Neurology, 2005