A comparison of clinical officers with medical doctors on outcomes of caesarean section in the developing world: meta-analysis of controlled studies
Open Access
- 13 May 2011
- Vol. 342 (may13 1), d2600
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2600
Abstract
Objective To review the effectiveness and safety of clinical officers (healthcare providers trained to perform tasks usually undertaken by doctors) carrying out caesarean section in developing countries compared with doctors. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, BioMed Central, the Reproductive Health Library, and the Science Citation Index (inception-2010) without language restriction. Study selection Controlled studies. Data extraction Information was extracted from each selected article on study characteristics, quality, and outcome data. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Results Six non-randomised controlled studies (16 018 women) evaluated the effectiveness of clinical officers carrying out caesarean section. Meta-analysis found no significant differences between the clinical officers and doctors for maternal death (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 2.75; P=0.24) or for perinatal death (1.31, 0.87 to 1.95; P=0.19). The results were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting a higher incidence of both outcomes with clinical officers. Clinical officers were associated with a higher incidence of wound infection (1.58, 1.01 to 2.47; P=0.05) and wound dehiscence (1.89, 1.21 to 2.95; P=0.005). Two studies accounted for confounding factors. Conclusion Clinical officers and doctors did not differ significantly in key outcomes for caesarean section, but the conclusions are tentative owing to the non-randomised nature of the studies. The increase in wound infection and dehiscence may highlight a particular training need for clinical officers.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina FasoHuman Resources for Health, 2009
- Mid-level providers in emergency obstetric and newborn health care: factors affecting their performance and retention within the Malawian health systemHuman Resources for Health, 2009
- The Quality Of Emergency Obstetrical Surgery By Assistant Medical Officers In Tanzanian District HospitalsHealth Affairs, 2009
- Non-physician clinicians in 47 sub-Saharan African countriesThe Lancet, 2007
- Postoperative outcome of caesarean sections and other major emergency obstetric surgery by clinical officers and medical officers in MalawiHuman Resources for Health, 2007
- An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"Globalization and Health, 2006
- Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk reviewHuman Resources for Health, 2004
- Caesarean section in Malawi: prospective study of early maternal and perinatal mortalityBMJ, 2003
- A comparative study of caesarean deliveries by assistant medical officers and obstetricians in MozambiqueBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- EMERGENCY OBSTETRIC SURGERY PERFORMED BY NURSES IN ZAIREThe Lancet, 1987