Multidisciplinary Mentoring Programs to Enhance Junior Faculty Research Grant Success
- 1 October 2017
- journal article
- other
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 92 (10), 1410-1415
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001620
Abstract
Problem Junior faculty face challenges in establishing independent research careers. Declining funding combined with a shift to multidisciplinary, collaborative science necessitates new mentorship models and enhanced institutional support. Approach Two multidisciplinary mentorship programs to promote grant success for junior faculty were established at the Duke University School of Medicine beginning in 2011. These four-month programs—the Path to Independence Program (PtIP) for National Institutes of Health (NIH) R applicants and the K Club for NIH K applicants—use multiple senior faculty mentors and professional grant-writing staff to provide a 20-hour joint curriculum comprising a series of lectures, hands-on workshops, career development counseling, peer groups, and an internal study section. In March 2016, the authors analyzed the success rate for all NIH grants submitted by participants since program enrollment. In a 2015 postprogram survey, participants rated their feelings of support and competency across six skill factors. Outcomes From October 2011 to March 2016, the programs engaged 265 senior faculty mentors, 145 PtIP participants, and 138 K Club participants. Success rates for NIH grant applications were 28% (61 awards/220 decisions) for PtIP participants—an increase over the 2010 Duke University junior faculty baseline of 11%—and 64% (38/59) for K Club participants. Respondents reported significantly increased feelings of support and self-ratings for each competency post program. Next Steps The authors plan to expand the breadth of both the mentorship pool and faculty served. Broad implementation of similar programs elsewhere could bolster success, satisfaction, and retention of junior faculty investigators.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Matrix Mentoring Model That Effectively Supports Clinical and Translational Scientists and Increases Inclusion in Biomedical ResearchAcademic Medicine, 2016
- Sustaining the Clinical and Translational Research WorkforceAcademic Medicine, 2015
- The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research InvestigatorsClinical and Translational Science, 2015
- Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flawsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014
- Mentor Networks in Academic MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2013
- Why Are a Quarter of Faculty Considering Leaving Academic Medicine? A Study of Their Perceptions of Institutional Culture and Intentions to Leave at 26 Representative U.S. Medical SchoolsAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Are Biostatistics Students Prepared to Succeed in the Era of Interdisciplinary Science? (And How Will We Know?)The American Statistician, 2011
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of KnowledgeScience, 2007