Bone Tissue Responses to Surface‐Modified Zirconia Implants: A Histomorphometric and Removal Torque Study in the Rabbit
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Vol. 7 (s1), s13-s20
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00070.x
Abstract
Background: Zirconia ceramics are biocompatible and have mechanical properties that make them suitable as materials for dental implants. Little is known about how surface modification influences the stability and bone tissue response to zirconia implants. Purpose: The objective of the investigation was to histologically and biomechanically evaluate the bone tissue response to zirconia implants with two different surface modifications in comparison with machined, nonmodified zirconia implants and oxidized titanium implants. Materials and Methods: Threaded zirconia implants with a diameter of 3.75 mm with either a machined surface (Zr‐Ctr) or one of two surface modifications (Zr‐A and Zr‐B) were manufactured. Oxidized titanium (Ti‐Ox) implants 3.75 mm in diameter were also used. The implants were characterized with regard to surface topography using an interferometer. Twelve rabbits received 96 implants using a rotational scheme, two in each tibia and two in each femur. The implants in six rabbits were subjected to removal torque (RTQ) tests after a healing period of 6 weeks. The implants in the remaining six animals were removed en bloc for light microscopic analysis. Back‐scatter scanning electron microscopic (BS‐SEM) analyses were used to evaluate the state of the bone‐implant interface at the modified zirconia implants after RTQ testing. Results: The Ti‐Ox and Zr‐A implants showed the highest surface roughness, followed by the Zr‐B implants and, finally, the Zr‐Ctr implants. The nonmodified ZrO2 implants showed statistically significant lower RTQs than all other implants. No significant differences in bone‐implant contact or bone area filling the threads were observed. BS‐SEM showed intact surface layers of the surface‐modified implants after RTQ testing and revealed fracture of the interface bone rather than a separation. Conclusion: The present study showed a strong bone tissue response to surface‐modified zirconia implants after 6 weeks of healing in rabbit bone. The modified zirconia implants showed a resistance to torque forces similar to that of oxidized implants and a four‐ to fivefold increase compared with machined zirconia implants. The findings suggest that surface‐modified zirconia implants can reach firm stability in bone.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Human Bone–Oxidized Titanium Implant Interface: A Light Microscopic, Scanning Electron Microscopic, Back‐Scatter Scanning Electron Microscopic, and Energy‐Dispersive X‐Ray Study of Clinically Retrieved Dental ImplantsClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2005
- Loaded Custom‐Made Zirconia and Titanium Implants Show Similar Osseointegration: An Animal ExperimentThe Journal of Periodontology, 2004
- Bone Response to Zirconia Ceramic Implants: An Experimental Study in RabbitsJournal of Oral Implantology, 2003
- Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid‐etched and the machined and acid‐etched titanium surface for dental implantsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002
- Anchorage of Titanium Implants with Different Surface Characteristics: An Experimental Study in RabbitsClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2000
- Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterialBiomaterials, 1999
- Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years’ function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic studyThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998
- Front tooth replacement with Tübingen (Frialit®) implantsJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1994
- Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healingThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1993
- Gingival fluid and tissues around successful titanium and ceramic implants: A comparative clinical, laboratory, and morphologic studyActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1991