The poor, the Black, and the marginalized as the source of cadavers in United States anatomical education
- 16 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Anatomy
- Vol. 20 (5), 489-495
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20445
Abstract
When the practice of hands‐on anatomical dissection became popular in United States medical education in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, demand for cadavers exceeded the supply. Slave bodies and thefts by grave robbers met this demand. Members of the public were aware that graves were being robbed and countered with various protective measures. Since the deterrence of grave robbing took time and money, those elements of society who were least economically and socially advantaged were the most vulnerable. Enslaved and free African Americans, immigrants, and the poor were frequently the target of grave robbing. The politically powerful tolerated this behavior except when it affected their own burial sites. Slave owners sold the bodies of their deceased chattel to medical schools for anatomic dissection. Stories of the “night doctors” buying and stealing bodies became part of African American folklore traditions. The physical and documentary evidence demonstrates the disproportionate use of the bodies of the poor, the Black, and the marginalized in furthering the medical education of white elites. Clin. Anat. 20:489–495, 2007.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Peculiar Population: The Nutrition, Health, and Mortality of American Slaves from Childhood to MaturityThe Journal of Economic History, 1986
- Slave Life Insurance in Virginia and North CarolinaThe Journal of Southern History, 1977
- Plagues and Peoples.The Journal of Southern History, 1977
- Black Tongue and Black Men: Pellagra and Slavery in the Antebellum SouthThe Journal of Southern History, 1977
- The Health of Slaves and the Health of Freedmen: A Savannah StudyPhylon (1960-), 1977
- The legal status of dissectingThe Anatomical Record, 1913
- The Negro as a SoldierAnthropological Review, 1869