Rapid quantitative D‐dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 14 (3), 504-509
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13234
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Heart & Stroke Foundation of Ontario
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary careBMJ, 2015
- Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Performance of 4 Clinical Decision Rules in the Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography vs Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismJAMA, 2007
- An Evaluation of d-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed TomographyJAMA, 2006
- Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patientsJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2004
- A Diagnostic Strategy Involving a Quantitative Latex d-Dimer Assay Reliably Excludes Deep Venous ThrombosisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Clinical Validity of a Normal Pulmonary Angiogram in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism—A Critical ReviewClinical Radiology, 2001
- Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatientsThe Lancet, 1999