The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers
- 20 April 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Nutrition Research Reviews
- Vol. 23 (1), 37-46
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422410000090
Abstract
Probiotics are usually defined as products which contain viable non-pathogenic micro-organisms able to confer health benefits to the host. There are specific gastrointestinal effects of probiotics such as alleviating inflammatory bowel disease, reducing acute diarrhoea in children, inhibitingSalmonellaandHelicobacter pylori, removing cholesterol, secreting enzymes and bacteriocins and immunomodulation. However, many of the effects obtained from viable cells of probiotics are also obtained from populations of dead cells. Heat-killed cells ofEnterococcus faecalisstimulate the gastrointestinal immune system in chicks. Dead bifidobacteria induce significant increases in TNF-α production. Administration of heat-killedE. faecalisto healthy dogs increases neutrophil phagocytes. The probiotic paradox is that both live and dead cells in probiotic products can generate beneficial biological responses. The action of probiotics could be a dual one. Live probiotic cells influence both the gastrointestinal microflora and the immune response whilst the components of dead cells exert an anti-inflammatory response in the gastrointestinal tract. This is quite analogous to a proposed mode of action of antimicrobial growth promoters in animal production. This has several implications for the production and application of probiotics, as it will be difficult to assess the relative proportions of live and dead cells in a probiotic culture. Variable amounts of dead cells might contribute to the variation in response often seen with live probiotic cultures. However, the use of dead probiotics as biological response modifiers has several attractive advantages; such products would be very safe and have a long shelf-life.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture treatment timing onSalmonella Enteritidis in neonatal broilersPoultry Science, 2010
- Effect of Probiotic Treatment in Broiler Chicks on Intestinal Macrophage Numbers and Phagocytosis of Salmonella Enteritidis by Abdominal Exudate CellsPoultry Science, 2007
- Effective prophylaxis against rotavirus diarrhea using a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and antibodiesBMC Microbiology, 2007
- Effects of β-glucan extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, and immunological and somatotropic responses of pigs challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide1Journal of Animal Science, 2006
- Immunomodulatory Effects of Polysaccharides Produced by Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1Journal of Dairy Science, 2006
- Acid and Bile Tolerance and Cholesterol Removal Ability of Lactobacilli StrainsJournal of Dairy Science, 2005
- In Vitro and In Vivo Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori by Lactobacillus casei Strain ShirotaApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004
- Cholesterol Removal from Media by LactococciJournal of Dairy Science, 2002
- Lactic Acid Bacteria Induce Apoptosis Inhibition in Salmonella typhimurium Infected MacrophagesFood and Agricultural Immunology, 2001
- Tolerance exists towards resident intestinal flora but is broken in active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 1995