Are Observational Studies More Informative Than Randomized Controlled Trials in Hypertension?
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Hypertension
- Vol. 62 (3), 463-469
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.00727
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lack of Reduction of Left Ventricular Mass in Treated Hypertension: The Strong Heart StudyJournal of the American Heart Association, 2013
- Inconsistent Definitions for Intention-To-Treat in Relation to Missing Outcome Data: Systematic Review of the Methods LiteraturePLOS ONE, 2012
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2012 UpdateCirculation, 2012
- Chlorthalidone Versus HydrochlorothiazideHypertension, 2011
- ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert Consensus Document on Hypertension in the Elderly: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of HypertensionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- Testing bias in clinical databases: methodological considerationsEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2010
- Regression of Left Ventricular Mass by Antihypertensive TreatmentHypertension, 2009
- Association of suboptimal blood pressure control with body size and metabolic abnormalitiesJournal of Hypertension, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Hypertension in Adults Across the Age SpectrumJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2005