Comparisons of ground-based tropospheric NO2 MAX-DOAS measurements to satellite observations with the aid of an air quality model over the Thessaloniki area, Greece
Open Access
- 11 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 17 (9), 5829-5849
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5829-2017
Abstract
One of the main issues arising from the comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements is the difference in spatial representativeness, which for locations with inhomogeneous spatial distribution of pollutants may lead to significant differences between the two data sets. In order to investigate the spatial variability of tropospheric NO2 within a sub-satellite pixel, a campaign which lasted for about 6 months was held in the greater area of Thessaloniki, Greece. Three multi-axial differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) systems performed measurements of tropospheric NO2 columns at different sites representative of urban, suburban and rural conditions. The direct comparison of these ground-based measurements with corresponding products from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument onboard NASA's Aura satellite (OMI/Aura) showed good agreement over the rural and suburban areas, while the comparison with the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) onboard EUMETSAT's Meteorological Operational satellites' (MetOp-A and MetOp-B) observations is good only over the rural area. GOME-2A and GOME-2B sensors show an average underestimation of tropospheric NO2 over the urban area of about 10.51 ± 8.32 × 1015 and 10.21 ± 8.87 × 1015 molecules cm−2, respectively. The mean difference between ground-based and OMI observations is significantly lower (6.60 ± 5.71 × 1015 molecules cm−2). The differences found in the comparisons of MAX-DOAS data with the different satellite sensors can be attributed to the higher spatial resolution of OMI, as well as the different overpass times and NO2 retrieval algorithms of the satellites. OMI data were adjusted using factors calculated by an air quality modeling tool, consisting of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) mesoscale meteorological model and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) multiscale photochemical transport model. This approach resulted in significant improvement of the comparisons over the urban monitoring site. The average difference of OMI observations from MAX-DOAS measurements was reduced to −1.68 ± 5.01 × 1015 molecules cm−2.Keywords
Funding Information
- Seventh Framework Programme (607405)
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in EuropeAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012
- Radicals and reservoirs in the GMI chemistry and transport model: Comparison to measurementsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Cloud pressure retrieval using the O2‐O2 absorption band at 477 nmJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Evaluating the credibility of transport processes in simulations of ozone recovery using the Global Modeling Initiative three-dimensional modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 2004
- A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2003
- The HITRAN molecular spectroscopic database: edition of 2000 including updates through 2001Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2003
- Measurements of molecular absorption spectra with the SCIAMACHY pre-flight model: instrument characterization and reference data for atmospheric remote-sensing in the 230–2380 nm regionJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2003
- A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniquesGeophysical Research Letters, 2002
- On the role of nitrogen dioxide in the absorption of solar radiationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999
- Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm−1 to 10 000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 KJournal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 1998