Reasons for noncompliance in donor risk reporting regarding male‐to‐male sex
- 9 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 56 (7), 1899-1906
- https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13627
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Netherlands men who have had sex with men were permanently excluded from donating blood or blood products. This study aimed to determine the rate of not disclosing male‐to‐male sex (noncompliance) among Dutch donors and reasons for noncompliance. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Invitations to participate in an anonymous online survey were sent out to a sample of the Dutch donor population (50,000 male and 5000 female donors). Male donors were asked if they ever had sex with a man. Second, a definition of male‐to‐male sex was given, followed by the same question. Donors who reported to have had male‐to‐male sex on the second question were defined as noncompliant and were asked what reasons they had for not reporting. We asked all donors questions regarding the Dutch donor policy. RESULTS A total of 18,137 male donors responded to the questionnaire. Of male donors, 1.4% reported to have had sex with a man, and 0.7% reported to have donated after their first male‐to‐male sex. Discrepancies were found in male donors’ interpretation of male‐to‐male sex. The most frequently reported reasons for noncompliance had to do with the timing and/or frequency of male‐to‐male sex, perceived privacy, perceived risk status, and knowledge about the policy. Compliers, noncompliers, and female donors had different opinions on a number of policy issues. CONCLUSION The percentage found for noncompliance is similar to percentages in other compliance studies worldwide. Based on reported reasons, a substantial amount of noncompliers would become eligible for donating under a revised policy, possibly without jeopardizing blood safety.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Views and experiences of men who have sex with men on the ban on blood donation: a cross sectional survey with qualitative interviewsBMJ, 2011
- Donor understanding and attitudes about current and potential deferral criteria for high‐risk sexual behaviorTransfusion, 2011
- Blood Donation, Deferral, and Discrimination: FDA Donor Deferral Policy for Men Who Have Sex With MenAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2010
- Donor's understanding of the definition of sex as applied to predonation screening questionsVox Sanguinis, 2008
- Computer-Based Blood Donor Screening: A Status ReportTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 2007
- The Canadian donor health assessment questionnaire: can it be improved?Transfusion, 2006
- The impact of male‐to‐male sexual experience on risk profiles of blood donorsTransfusion, 2005
- Do blood donors read and understand screening educational materials?Transfusion, 2003
- Test-seeking as motivation in volunteer blood donorsTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 2000
- The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996