The Association between Quality of Care and the Intensity of Diabetes Disease Management Programs
Open Access
- 18 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 145 (2), 107-116
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00008
Abstract
Although disease management programs are widely implemented, little is known about their effectiveness. To determine whether disease management by physician groups is associated with diabetes care processes, control of intermediate outcomes, or the amount of medication used when intermediate outcomes are above target levels. Cross-sectional study. Patients were randomly sampled from 63 physician groups nested in 7 health plans sponsored by Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (87%) and from 4 health plans with individual physician contracts (13%). 8661 adults with diabetes who completed a survey (2000–2001) and had medical record data. Physician group and health plan directors described their organizations' use of physician reminders, performance feedback, and structured care management on a survey; their responses were used to determine measures of intensity of disease management. The current study measured 8 processes of care, including most recent hemoglobin A1c level, systolic blood pressure, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and several measures of medication use. Increased use of any of 3 disease management strategies was significantly associated with higher adjusted rates of retinal screening, nephropathy screening, foot examinations, and measurement of hemoglobin A1c levels. Serum lipid level testing and influenza vaccine administration were associated with greater use of structured care management and performance feedback. Greater use of performance feedback correlated with an increased rate of foot examinations (difference, 5 percentage points [95% CI, 1 to 8 percentage points]), and greater use of physician reminders was associated with an increased rate of nephropathy screening (difference, 15 percentage points [CI, 6 to 23 percentage points]). No strategies were associated with intermediate outcome levels or level of medication management. Physician groups were not randomly sampled from population-based listings, and disease management strategies were not randomly allocated across groups. Disease management strategies were associated with better processes of diabetes care but not with improved intermediate outcomes or level of medication management. A greater focus on direct measurement, feedback, and reporting of intermediate outcome levels or of level of medication management may enhance the effectiveness of these programs. *See Appendix 1 for a complete list of the TRIAD Study Group.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Poor Control of Risk Factors for Vascular Disease Among Adults With Previously Diagnosed DiabetesJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2004
- External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic DiseasesJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2003
- The Impact of Planned Care and a Diabetes Electronic Management System on Community-Based Diabetes CareDiabetes Care, 2002
- The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002
- A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990sAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into ActionHealth Affairs, 2001
- Interventions to Improve the Management of Diabetes in Primary Care, Outpatient, and Community SettingsDiabetes Care, 2001
- Department of Veterans Affairs' Quality Enhancement Research Initiative for Diabetes MellitusMedical Care, 2000
- Risk and protective factors associated with screening for complications of diabetes in a health maintenance organization setting.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Population-Based Assessment of the Level of Care Among Adults With Diabetes in the U.SDiabetes Care, 1998