Evaluation of Juvenile Competency to Proceed: Applying theDuskyStandard
- 19 January 2010
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice
- Vol. 10 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930903172973
Abstract
Despite the general lack of legal guidance in defining the minimum standard for juvenile competency to proceed, such evaluations are frequently requested. Research suggests that younger adolescents are found incompetent at higher rates than adults and may have unique deficits due to their developmental immaturity. Evaluators must consider these potential deficits when applying the Dusky standard to juvenile evaluations, and make reasonable recommendations regarding the likelihood of the achievement of competence if developmental immaturity plays a fundamental role. This case vignette illustrates how to evaluate and consider developmental immaturity when applying the Dusky standard to juvenile competency to proceed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Judges' and defense attorneys' views of legal standards for adolescents in juvenile and criminal court.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2007
- Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, and Risky Decision Making in Adolescence and Adulthood: An Experimental Study.Developmental Psychology, 2005
- Less Guilty by Reason of Adolescence: Developmental Immaturity, Diminished Responsibility, and the Juvenile Death Penalty.American Psychologist, 2003
- Costs and benefits of a decisionJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2001
- Psychometric properties of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Criminal Adjudication.Psychological Assessment, 1998
- Assessing Competence to Consent to TreatmentPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1998
- Children's knowledge of the legal system: Are they competent to instruct legal counsel?Canadian Journal of Criminology, 1992