Performing 'Initial Assessment': Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services
Open Access
- 18 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Social Work
- Vol. 40 (2), 352-370
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn162
Abstract
This article draws attention to the faulty design elements at the front-door of children's local authority services, arguing that current attempts to increase safety, through the formalization of organizational procedures and their enactment by IT systems, may have had the contrary effect. We argue that the analysis of errors in organizational settings should focus on immanent systemic weaknesses, particularly the ‘latent conditions’ for error that generally increase the risk of failure. Reporting the findings from a two-year ESRC-funded ethnographic study, and examining the local adaptations of practice arising in the performance context of the ‘modernized’ front-door of children's services, we draw attention to the short-cuts that the current configuration of the initial assessment system appears to necessitate, given the immutable timescales and excessive audit requirements. New modes of governance can clearly play a central role in error management, but the design of an effective system needs to be based on the needs of users and on a thorough understanding of their working practices.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Child protection and re‐referrals involving serious concerns: a follow‐up study of 400 referrals closed by Social Services DepartmentsChild & Family Social Work, 2008
- Professional Responsibility, Misconduct and Practical ReasonEthics and Social Welfare, 2007
- What tools do we need to improve identification of child abuse?Child Abuse Review, 2005
- Visibility and ‘child view’ in the assessment process of social work: cross‐national comparisonsInternational Journal of Social Welfare, 2005
- From policy to practice: the implementation of a new framework for social work assessments of children and familiesChild & Family Social Work, 2004
- Maintaining a focus on the child? First impressions of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families in cases of child neglectChild Abuse Review, 2002
- Emotional labour and befriending in family support and child protection in Tower HamletsChild & Family Social Work, 2002
- Avoidable and Unavoidable Mistakes in Child Protection WorkThe British Journal of Social Work, 1996
- The ‘problem ’ with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not ‘over-automation’Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1990
- The integration of computing and routine workACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1986