Incidence of weapon injuries not related to interfactional combat in Afghanistan in 1996: prospective cohort study

Abstract

Objective: To examine the descriptive epidemiology of weapon injuries not directly attributable to combat during armed conflict. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Nangarhar region of Afghanistan, which experienced effective peace, intense fighting, and then peace over six months in 1996. Subjects: 608 people admitted to Jalalabad hospital because of weapon injuries. Main outcome measures: Estimated incidence of injuries from combat or otherwise (non-combat injury) before, during, and after the fall of Kabul. Results: Incidence of non-combat injury was initially 65 per 100 000. During the intense military campaign for Kabul the incidence declined dramatically, and then differentially increased dependent on injury subcategory—that is, whether injuries were accidental or intentional and whether they were inflicted by firearms or fragmenting munitions. Non-combat injuries accounted for 51% of weapon injuries observed over the study period. Civilians were more likely to have non-combat injuries than combat injuries. Conclusions: Weapon injuries that are not attributable to combat are common. Social changes accompanying conflict and widespread availability of weapons may be predictive of use of weapons that persists independently of conflict. A region in Afghanistan experienced peace, intense combat, and then peace in 1996 During peace the incidence of injury from weapons was high, the incidence of injury from firearms being similar to that in the United States Over half of all weapon injuries were not attributable to interfactional combat Weapon availability and social breakdown accompanying conflict may be important factors in the occurrence of weapon injuries that persist independently of conflict