Using Activity Theory to Explain Differences in Patterns of Dyadic Interactions in an ESL Class
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) in The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes
- Vol. 60 (4), 457-480
- https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457
Abstract
Variations in how L2 learners work in pairs/groups have been noted by a number of researchers. However, explanations for such variations are often made in terms of differences in L2 proficiency or culture. What has often been overlooked is the participants' orientation to an activity and, in particular, their motives and goals. The importance of human motives and goals in explaining human behaviour is encapsulated in activity theory (Leont'ev, 1981). It is this theoretical perspective that guided the study reported in this article. The study attempted to explain variations found in the ways students interacted in pairs in a university ESL class. The data consist of interviews with eight participants who formed four case study pairs, each case exemplifying a distinct pattern of dyadic interaction. The findings suggest that patterns of dyadic interaction can be traced to the nature of the participants' goals and to whether or not members of the dyad share these goals.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Collaboration Be Unsuccessful? A Sociocultural Analysis of Classroom Setting and Japanese L2 Performance in Group TasksThe Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 2000
- Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork SettingRELC Journal, 1999
- ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groupsJournal of Second Language Writing, 1998
- A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of MeaningApplied Linguistics, 1998
- Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and ContentLanguage Learning, 1995
- Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness1Language Awareness, 1994
- Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?TESOL Quarterly, 1993
- Discourse Styles and Patterns of Participation on ESL Interactive TasksTESOL Quarterly, 1992
- Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer educationInternational Journal of Educational Research, 1989
- Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist, 1986