Peak flow rate records in surveys: reproducibility of observers' reports.
Open Access
- 1 November 1984
- Vol. 39 (11), 828-832
- https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.39.11.828
Abstract
Records of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), commonly used in hospital in the management of asthma, have not been evaluated as a method of identifying cases of asthma in population surveys. Four observers were asked to report on whether asthma was present or absent in 61 graphs of PEFR recorded two hourly for four weeks during surveys of working population. Agreement within individual observers was measured using a subset of 29 graphs which had been copied and distributed at random among the set of 61; agreement was good, from 90% in one observer to 100% in two. Agreement between observers was measured on the basis of all 61 graphs. Agreement occurred between all four observers in 69% of graphs, between at least three out of four in 97%, and, when pairs of observers were examined, between 72% and 93% of graphs. Graphs assessed as showing asthma demonstrated more within day PEFR variability (expressed as the number of days in which the difference between maximum and minimum readings was at least 15%) than graphs assessed as not showing asthma. Some graphs with little within day variability were assessed as showing asthma, apparently because they demonstrated between day PEFR variability.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tetrachlorophthalic anhydride asthma: evidence for specific IgE antibodyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1983
- Peak flow rate records in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to colophony.Thorax, 1979
- A miniature Wright peak-flow meter.BMJ, 1978
- On observing patterns of airflow obstruction in chronic asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 1977
- Diagnostic Terms in Broncho-pulmonary DiseaseBMJ, 1963
- Disagreement Between Observers in an Epidemiological Study of Respiratory DiseaseBMJ, 1955
- OBSERVER ERROR IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CHEST FILMS: AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONThe Lancet, 1952
- The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema; an experimental study.1952
- OBSERVERS' ERRORS IN TAKING MEDICAL HISTORIESThe Lancet, 1951