Clinical, Aetiological, Anatomical and Pathological Classification (Ceap): Gold Standard and Limits
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease
- Vol. 27 (1_suppl), 114-118
- https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2012.012s19
Abstract
The first CEAP (clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements) consensus document was published after a consensus conference of the American Venous Forum, held at the sixth annual meeting of the AVF in February 1994 in Maui, Hawaii. In the following years the CEAP classification was published in many international journals and books which has led to widespread international use of the CEAP classification since 1995. The aim of this paper is to review the benefits and limits of CEAP from the available literature. In an actual Medline analysis with the keywords ‘CEAP’ and ‘venous insufficiency’, 266 publications using the CEAP classification in venous diseases are available. The CEAP classification was accepted in the venous community and used in scientific publications, but in most of the cases only the clinical classification was used. Limitations of the first version including a lack of clear definition of clinical signs led to a revised version. The CEAP classification is the gold standard of classification of chronic venous disorders today. Nevertheless for proper use some facts have to be taken into account: the CEAP classification is not a severity classification, C2 summarizes all kinds of varicose veins, in C3 it may be difficult to separate venous and other reasons for oedema, and corona phlebectatica is not included in the classification. Further revisions of the CEAP classification may help to overcome the still-existing deficits.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical analysis of the corona phlebectaticaJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2012
- The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous ForumJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2011
- Heterogeneity of Reporting Standards in Randomised Clinical Trials of Endovenous Interventions for Varicose VeinsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010
- Clinical and hemodynamic significance of corona phlebectatica in chronic venous disordersJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2005
- Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statementJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2004
- Do We Need a Better Classification than CEAP ?Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 2004
- The “C” of CEAP: Suggested definitions and refinements: An international union of phlebology conference of expertsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessmentJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2000
- Classification and Grading of Chronic Venous Disease in the Lower LimbsVascular Surgery, 1996
- Reporting standards in venous disease: An updateJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1995