Methodological pluralism: The gold standard of STEM evaluation
- 23 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in New Directions for Evaluation
- Vol. 2006 (109), 19-34
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.176
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence on “What Works”: An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation DesignsEducational Researcher, 2005
- Ka‘akālai Kū Kanaka: A Call for Strengths-Based Approaches from a Native Hawaiian PerspectiveEducational Researcher, 2005
- Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in EducationEducational Researcher, 2004
- Improving Educational Research:Toward a More Useful, More Influential, and Better-Funded EnterpriseEducational Researcher, 2003
- How Can Multi-Site Evaluations be Participatory?American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
- Theme Issue: The Role of Design in Educational ResearchEducational Researcher, 2003
- Scientific Culture and Educational ResearchEducational Researcher, 2002
- Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More PublicEducational Researcher, 2002
- The Archipelago Approach To Mixed Method EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2002
- The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size ExperimentAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2000