Survival benefit of multiple arterial grafting in a 25-year single-institutional experience: the importance of the third arterial graft
Open Access
- 26 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 42 (2), 284-291
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezr302
Abstract
The long-term advantages of multiple arterial grafts, particularly a third arterial conduit, for coronary artery bypass (CABG) are not clear. This study was designed to test whether multiple arterial grafts would provide better long-term outcomes when compared with approaches using fewer arterial conduits. Between 1985 and 1995, prospective data were collected for 588 patients undergoing isolated CABG at our institution. We examined long-term survival and freedom from cardiac death. The primary analysis compared patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) vs. single ITA (SITA). In a subgroup analysis, BITA patients receiving a right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) were compared with those receiving a saphenous vein graft (SVG) as a third conduit. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to adjust for relevant confounders. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves over the follow-up period. The mean age was 59 ± 9 years and 49% received BITA. Mean follow-up was 16.1 ± 5.4 years. Multivariable analysis revealed that overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.017] and cardiac survival (HR: 0.61, P = 0.004) was significantly improved in the presence of BITA compared with SITA. The survival at 10 and 20 years was 90.2 ± 3.4 and 56.9 ± 6.4% for the BITA vs. 82 ± 4.4 and 40.9 ± 6% for the SITA, respectively. In the subgroup of BITA patients, those receiving the RGEA as a third conduit had superior overall survival (HR: 0.41, P = 0.0032) and cardiac survival (HR: 0.18, P = 0.004) compared with those receiving an SVG. The survival at 10 and 20 years was 98.9 ± 2 and 68.9 ± 18% for the BITA/RGEA vs. 87.2 ± 4.6 and 50.3 ± 7% for the BITA/SVG, respectively. In a single-institution experience, the use of multiple arterial grafting is independently associated with superior outcomes. Furthermore, the use of a third arterial conduit (RGEA) targeted to the right coronary artery should be considered to improve long-term survival.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Patient and Target-Vessel Characteristics on Arterial and Venous Bypass Graft PatencyCirculation, 2007
- Revascularization of the Right Coronary Artery in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery GraftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 20021European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- Superiority of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery GraftingCirculation, 2001
- Complementary saphenous grafting: Long-term follow-upThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- Limited flow capacity of the right gastroepiploic artery graft: postoperative echocardiographic and angiographic evaluationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Radial artery has higher receptor-mediated contractility but similar endothelial function compared with mammary arteryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- A novel preservation medium protecting prostacyclin production and endothelial integrity of the human saphenous vein graftThrombosis Research, 1990
- Techniques for Multiple Internal Mammary Artery Bypass GraftsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984