The Diagnostic Value of Physical Examination and Additional Testing in Primary Care Patients With Suspected Heart Failure
- 1 December 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation
- Vol. 124 (25), 2865-2873
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.019216
Abstract
Background—: Early diagnosis of nonacute heart failure is crucial because prompt initiation of evidence-based treatment can prevent or slow down further progression. To diagnose new-onset heart failure in primary care is challenging. Methods and Results—: This is a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study with external validation. Seven hundred twenty-one consecutive patients suspected of new-onset heart failure underwent standardized diagnostic work-up including chest x-ray, spirometry, ECG, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement, and echocardiography in specially equipped outpatient diagnostic heart failure clinics. The presence of heart failure was determined by an outcome panel using the initial clinical data and 6-month follow-up data, blinded to biomarker data. Of the 721 patients, 207 (28.7%) had heart failure. The combination of 3 items from history (age, coronary artery disease, and loop diuretic use) plus 6 from physical examination (pulse rate and regularity, displaced apex beat, rales, heart murmur, and increased jugular vein pressure) showed independent diagnostic value (c-statistic 0.83). NT-proBNP was the most powerful supplementary diagnostic test, increasing the c-statistic to 0.86 and resulting in net reclassification improvement of 69% ( P <0.0001). A simplified diagnostic rule was applied to 2 external validation datasets, resulting in c- statistics of 0.95 and 0.88, confirming the results. Conclusions—: In this study, we estimated the quantitative diagnostic contribution of elements of the history and physical examination in the diagnosis of heart failure in primary care outpatients, which may help to improve clinical decision making. The largest additional quantitative diagnostic contribution to those elements was provided by measurement of NT-proBNP. For daily practice, a diagnostic rule was derived that may be useful to quantify the probability of heart failure in patients with new symptoms suggestive of heart failure.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkersStatistics in Medicine, 2010
- ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)European Heart Journal, 2008
- Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk PredictionCirculation, 2007
- Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing valuesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005)European Heart Journal, 2005
- Test Research versus Diagnostic ResearchClinical Chemistry, 2004
- European survey of primary care physician perceptions on heart failure diagnosis and management (Euro-HF)European Heart Journal, 2000
- ABC of heart failure: Clinical features and complicationsBMJ, 2000
- Incidence and aetiology of heart failure; a population-based studyEuropean Heart Journal, 1999
- The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic testsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992