MRI-based measurements of respiratory motion variability and assessment of imaging strategies for radiotherapy planning
- 8 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 51 (17), 4147-4169
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/17/003
Abstract
Respiratory organ motion has a significant impact on the planning and delivery of radiotherapy (RT) treatment for lung cancer. Currently widespread techniques, such as 4D-computed tomography (4DCT), cannot be used to measure variability of this motion from one cycle to the next. In this paper, we describe the use of fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to investigate the intra- and inter-cycle reproducibility of respiratory motion and also to estimate the level of errors that may be introduced into treatment delivery by using various breath-hold imaging strategies during lung RT planning. A reference model of respiratory motion is formed to enable comparison of different breathing cycles at any arbitrary position in the respiratory cycle. This is constructed by using free-breathing images from the inhale phase of a single breathing cycle, then co-registering the images, and thereby tracking landmarks. This reference model is then compared to alternative models constructed from images acquired during the exhale phase of the same cycle and the inhale phase of a subsequent cycle, to assess intra- and inter-cycle variability ('hysteresis' and 'reproducibility') of organ motion. The reference model is also compared to a series of models formed from breath-hold data at exhale and inhale. Evaluation of these models is carried out on data from ten healthy volunteers and five lung cancer patients. Free-breathing models show good levels of intra- and inter-cycle reproducibility across the tidal breathing range. Mean intra-cycle errors in the position of organ surface landmarks of 1.5(1.4)-3.5(3.3) mm for volunteers and 2.8(1.8)-5.2(5.2) mm for patients. Equivalent measures of inter-cycle variability across this range are 1.7(1.0)-3.9(3.3) mm for volunteers and 2.8(1.8)-3.3(2.2) mm for patients. As expected, models based on breath-hold sequences do not represent normal tidal motion as well as those based on free-breathing data, with mean errors of 4.4(2.2)-7.7(3.9) mm for volunteers and 10.1(6.1)-12.5(6.3) mm for patients. Errors are generally larger still when using a single breath-hold image at either exhale or inhale to represent the lung. This indicates that account should be taken of intra- and inter-cycle respiratory motion variability and that breath-hold-based methods of obtaining data for RT planning may potentially introduce large errors. This approach to analysis of motion and variability has potential to inform decisions about treatment margins and optimize RT planning.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alignment of sparse freehand 3-D ultrasound with preoperative images of the liver using models of respiratory motion and deformationIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2005
- Comparison of end normal inspiration and expiration for gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2005
- Intrathoracic tumour motion estimation from CT imaging using the 3D optical flow methodPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2004
- Evaluation of the influence of breathing on the movement and modeling of lung tumorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- Effects of motion on the total dose distributionSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 2004
- Automated generation of a four-dimensional model of the liver using warping and mutual informationMedical Physics, 2003
- Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapyIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002
- What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer?Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1998
- Improvement of CT-based treatment-planning models of abdominal targets using static exhale imagingInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathingInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996