Roll Tilt Psychophysics in Rhesus Monkeys During Vestibular and Visual Stimulation
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 100 (1), 140-153
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01012.2007
Abstract
How does the brain calculate the spatial orientation of the head relative to gravity? Psychophysical measurements are critical to investigate this question, but such measurements have been limited to humans. In non-human primates, behavioral measures have focused on vestibular-mediated eye movements, which do not reflect percepts of head orientation. We have therefore developed a method to measure tilt perception in monkeys, derived from the subjective visual vertical (SVV) task. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to align a light bar parallel to gravity and performed this task during roll tilts, centrifugation, and roll optokinetic stimulation. The monkeys accurately aligned the light bar with gravity during static roll tilts but also demonstrated small orientation-dependent misperceptions of the tilt angle analogous to those measured in humans. When the gravito-inertial force (GIF) rotated dynamically in the roll plane, SVV responses remained closely aligned with the GIF during roll tilt of the head (coplanar canal rotational cues present), lagged slightly behind the GIF during variable-radius centrifugation (no canal cues present), and shifted gradually during fixed-radius centrifugation (orthogonal yaw canal cues present). SVV responses also deviated away from the earth-vertical during roll optokinetic stimulation. These results demonstrate that rotational cues derived from the semicircular canals and visual system have prominent effects on psychophysical measurements of roll tilt in rhesus monkeys and therefore suggest that a central synthesis of graviceptive and rotational cues contributes to percepts of head orientation relative to gravity in non-human primates.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. II. VOR and Perceptual Responses During CombinedTilt&TranslationJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. I. Frequency Response of VOR and Perceptual Responses DuringTranslationandTiltJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Neural Processing of Gravito-Inertial Cues in Humans. IV. Influence of Visual Rotational Cues During Roll Optokinetic StimuliJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003
- Does the world rock when the eyes roll?Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2000
- Linear Acceleration Perception: Frequency Dependence of the Hilltop IllusionActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1995
- Perception of the Body in Space: MechanismsPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,1984
- Subjective Detection Of Vertical Acceleration: A Velocity-Dependent Response?Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1978
- Moving Visual Scenes Influence the Apparent Direction of GravityScience, 1972
- The Effect of Semicircular Canal Stimulation During Tilting on the Subsequent Perception of the Visual VerticalActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1970
- Human Spatial OrientationPublished by University of Illinois Press ,1967