There are neither “king” nor “crown” in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed “alternative” method of normalization
- 31 January 2011
- journal article
- other
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Informetrics
- Vol. 5 (1), 226-227
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.005
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerationsJournal of Informetrics, 2011
- Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performanceJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and LeydesdorffJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- The danger of pseudoscience in InformetricsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvreJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviorJournal of Documentation, 2008
- Lifting the crown—citation z-scoreJournal of Informetrics, 2007