On effect size.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Methods
- Vol. 17 (2), 137-152
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028086
Abstract
The call for researchers to report and interpret effect sizes and their corresponding confidence intervals has never been stronger. However, there is confusion in the literature on the definition of effect size, and consequently the term is used inconsistently. We propose a definition for effect size, discuss 3 facets of effect size (dimension, measure/index, and value), outline 10 corollaries that follow from our definition, and review ideal qualities of effect sizes. Our definition of effect size is general and subsumes many existing definitions of effect size. We define effect size as a quantitative reflection of the magnitude of some phenomenon that is used for the purpose of addressing a question of interest. Our definition of effect size is purposely more inclusive than the way many have defined and conceptualized effect size, and it is unique with regard to linking effect size to a question of interest. Additionally, we review some important developments in the effect size literature and discuss the importance of accompanying an effect size with an interval estimate that acknowledges the uncertainty with which the population value of the effect size has been estimated. We hope that this article will facilitate discussion and improve the practice of reporting and interpreting effect sizes.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample Size Planning for the Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient: Accuracy in Parameter Estimation via Narrow Confidence IntervalsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2008
- Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter EstimationAnnual Review of Psychology, 2008
- Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means.Psychological Methods, 2008
- Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologistsBiological Reviews, 2007
- When effect sizes disagree: The case of r and d.Psychological Methods, 2006
- The Effects of Nonnormal Distributions on Confidence Intervals Around the Standardized Mean Difference: Bootstrap and Parametric Confidence IntervalsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2005
- How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2004
- Sample Size for Multiple Regression: Obtaining Regression Coefficients That Are Accurate, Not Simply Significant.Psychological Methods, 2003
- On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.Psychological Methods, 2002
- Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist, 1999