Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance between Version 2.0 and 2.1 for Prostatic Peripheral Zone
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Korean Society of Radiology in Korean Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 22 (7), 1100-1109
- https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0837
Abstract
Kim HS, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2021 Apr;22:e47. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0837Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2018
- Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysisEuropean Urology, 2017
- Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate RadiologistsRadiology, 2016
- Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer DetectionJournal of Urology, 2016
- PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2European Urology, 2015
- Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring systemBJU International, 2013
- Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal dataScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2005
- Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squaresStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired DesignsBiometrics, 2000
- Zonal Distribution of Prostatic AdenocarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1988