Expression in Aneuploid Drosophila S2 Cells
Open Access
- 23 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 8 (2), e1000320
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000320
Abstract
Extensive departures from balanced gene dose in aneuploids are highly deleterious. However, we know very little about the relationship between gene copy number and expression in aneuploid cells. We determined copy number and transcript abundance (expression) genome-wide in Drosophila S2 cells by DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq. We found that S2 cells are aneuploid for >43 Mb of the genome, primarily in the range of one to five copies, and show a male genotype (∼ two X chromosomes and four sets of autosomes, or 2X;4A). Both X chromosomes and autosomes showed expression dosage compensation. X chromosome expression was elevated in a fixed-fold manner regardless of actual gene dose. In engineering terms, the system “anticipates” the perturbation caused by X dose, rather than responding to an error caused by the perturbation. This feed-forward regulation resulted in precise dosage compensation only when X dose was half of the autosome dose. Insufficient compensation occurred at lower X chromosome dose and excessive expression occurred at higher doses. RNAi knockdown of the Male Specific Lethal complex abolished feed-forward regulation. Both autosome and X chromosome genes show Male Specific Lethal–independent compensation that fits a first order dose-response curve. Our data indicate that expression dosage compensation dampens the effect of altered DNA copy number genome-wide. For the X chromosome, compensation includes fixed and dose-dependent components. While it is widely recognized that mutations in protein coding genes can have harmful consequences, one can also have too much or too little of a good thing. Except for the sex chromosomes, genes come in sets of two in diploid organisms. Extra or missing copies of genes or chromosomes result in an imbalance that can lead to cancers, miscarriages, and disease susceptibility. We have examined what happens to gene expression in Drosophila cells with the types of gross copy number changes that are typical of cancers. We have compared the response of autosomes and sex chromosomes and show that there is some compensation for copy number change in both cases. One response is universal and acts to correct copy number changes by changing transcript abundance. The other is specific to the X chromosome and acts to increase expression regardless of gene dose. Our data highlight how important gene expression balance is for cell function.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Copy number variants, diseases and gene expressionHuman Molecular Genetics, 2009
- Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistryNature, 2008
- Small-scale copy number variation and large-scale changes in gene expressionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Genomic RNAi screening in Drosophila S2 cells: what have we learned about host–pathogen interactions?Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2008
- Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-SeqNature Methods, 2008
- FlyBase: integration and improvements to query toolsNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genusNature, 2007
- Cotranscriptional recruitment of the dosage compensation complex to X-linked target genesGenes & Development, 2007
- Cumulative contributions of weak DNA determinants to targeting the Drosophila dosage compensation complexNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- High-resolution ChIP–chip analysis reveals that the Drosophila MSL complex selectively identifies active genes on the male X chromosomeGenes & Development, 2006