Self, Society, and the "New Gerontology"
Open Access
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Gerontologist
- Vol. 43 (6), 787-796
- https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.6.787
Abstract
The “new gerontology,” built on the concept of successful aging, sets forth the preconditions for and the end product of the process of aging successfully. Focused on health and active participation in life, it vests largely within individuals the power to achieve this normatively desirable state. While acknowledging the contributions of the scientific base for Rowe and Kahn's successful aging model, we emphasize the need for a more careful examination of the model itself. Using critical gerontology as a primary filter, we critique this normative vision by focusing on its unarticulated (and perhaps unexplored) values, assumptions, and consequences. We argue that these unexamined features may further harm older people, particularly older women, the poor, and people of color who are already marginalized. We conclude by suggesting forms of resistance to this univocal standard.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empowerment and long-living women: return to the rejected bodyJournal of Aging Studies, 2003
- Busy Bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday lifeJournal of Aging Studies, 2000
- Narrative Practice and the Coherence of Personal StoriesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1998
- Seniors as Researchers in the Study of Aging: Learning and DoingThe Gerontologist, 1997
- The New GerontologyScience, 1997
- Successful AgingThe Gerontologist, 1997
- A life span model of successful aging.American Psychologist, 1996
- Individual Agency, the Ordinary, and Postmodern LifeThe Sociological Quarterly, 1995
- Embodiment and Emplacement: Identities, Representation and Landscape in Sun City Retirement CommunitiesInternational Journal of Aging & Human Development, 1995
- Who Theorises Age?Ageing and Society, 1990