A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis for rhesus‐negative women who are pregnant
- 23 August 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 111 (9), 892-902
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00243.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newbornBlood Reviews, 2000
- Management of women who are Rhesus D negative in Northern IrelandJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Preventing Rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti‐D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Multicentre trial of antepartum low‐dose anti‐D immunoglobulinTransfusion Medicine, 1995
- Management of bleeding in early pregnancy in accident and emergency departmentsBMJ, 1994
- Efficacy and long term effects of antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.BMJ, 1989
- Prenatal Rh‐Immune Prophylaxis With 300 μg Immune Globulin Anti‐D In The 28th Week Of PregnancyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1989
- Failures of Intravenous Rh Immune Globulin Prophylaxis: An Analysis of the Reasons for Such FailuresTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 1987
- THE YORKSHIRE ANTENATAL ANTI-D IMMUNOGLOBULIN TRIAL IN PRIMIGRAVIDAEThe Lancet, 1983