Trends in Hospital Volume and Patterns of Referral for Women With Gynecologic Cancers
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 121 (6), 1217-1225
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31828ec686
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate trends in hospital volume and referral patterns for women with uterine and ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database was used to identify women aged 65 years or older with ovarian and uterine cancer who underwent surgery from 2000 to 2007. “Volume creep,” when a greater number of patients undergo surgery at the same hospitals, and “market concentration,” when a similar overall number of patients undergo a procedure but at a smaller number of hospitals, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 4,522 patients with ovarian cancer, mean hospital volume increased from 3.1 cases during 2000–2001 to 3.4 cases during 2006–2007 (P=.62) suggesting minimal volume creep. Similarly, there was little evidence of market concentration. In 2000–2001, 37.8% of women were treated at the top decile by volume hospitals compared with 41.4% in 2006–2007 (P=.14). In 2006–2007, 201 (63.2%) of the hospitals had an ovarian cancer surgery volume of two or fewer cases. Among 9,908 women with uterine cancer, the mean hospital volume increased slightly from 4.5 in 2000–2001 to 5.4 in 2006–2007 (P=.10). The percentage of patients treated at the top decile by volume of hospitals increased from 40.4% in 2000–2001 to 44.7% in 2006–2007 (P<.001). In 2006–2007, 243 (49.3%) of the hospitals had a uterine cancer surgery volume of two or fewer cases. CONCLUSION: There have been only modest changes in the referral patterns of women with ovarian and uterine cancer. A large number of hospitals have a very low procedural volume. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for High-Risk SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Effect of Surgical Volume on Morbidity and Mortality of Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial CancerObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Risk-based Selective Referral for Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs in perioperative medicine: Are they meeting their goalsCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Has Recognition of the Relationship Between Mortality Rates and Hospital Volume for Major Cancer Surgery in California Made a Difference?Annals of Surgery, 2009
- Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality ImprovementNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Ovarian cancer surgery in Maryland: volume-based access to careGynecologic Oncology, 2004
- The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatmentGynecologic Oncology, 2004
- Regional Availability Of High-Volume Hospitals For Major SurgeryHealth Affairs, 2004
- The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001