Harmonization may be counterproductive--at least for parts of Europe where public health research operates effectively
Open Access
- 10 November 2011
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 21 (6), 686-687
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr149
Abstract
Carinci et al. suggest that harmonization of data protection procedures between all EU Member States regarding research with patient data should be emphasized in the current proposal to update the European Union Data Protection directive (EU 95/46/EC),1 in order to facilitate optimal public health research that is executed with the highest standards of confidentiality. According to these authors, the exemptions to the strict requirements for consent that are provided for certain types of research by the current data protection directive2 have not been sufficiently or uniformly implemented by national legislatures. They see harmonization as a way to improve the situation in countries where that implementation is inadequate.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Viewpoint: A method to estimate the cost in lives of ethics board review of biomedical researchJournal of Internal Medicine, 2011
- The Need to Downregulate: A Minimal Ethical Framework for Biobank ResearchMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2010
- National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer RegistryBMJ, 2006
- Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general populationBMJ, 2004