How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
Top Cited Papers
- 25 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 107 (1), 57-79
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055412000500
Abstract
Competition is a defining element of democracy. One of the most noteworthy events over the last quarter-century in U.S. politics is the change in the nature of elite party competition: The parties have become increasingly polarized. Scholars and pundits actively debate how these elite patterns influence polarization among the public (e.g., have citizens also become more ideologically polarized?). Yet, few have addressed what we see as perhaps more fundamental questions: Has elite polarization altered the way citizens arrive at their policy opinions in the first place and, if so, in what ways? We address these questions with a theory and two survey experiments (on the issues of drilling and immigration). We find stark evidence that polarized environments fundamentally change how citizens make decisions. Specifically, polarization intensifies the impact of party endorsements on opinions, decreases the impact of substantive information and, perhaps ironically, stimulates greater confidence in those—less substantively grounded—opinions. We discuss the implications for public opinion formation and the nature of democratic competition.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Partisan Political JustificationAmerican Political Science Review, 2011
- California: A Failed State or Too Big to Fail?California Journal of Politics and Policy, 2011
- Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over TimeAmerican Political Science Review, 2010
- Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite PolarizationPolitical Behavior, 2009
- Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?Political Behavior, 2007
- Framing Public Opinion in Competitive DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review, 2007
- Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing EffectsAmerican Political Science Review, 2004
- Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is NeededOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- The Adaptive Decision MakerPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Reasoning and ChoicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991