How independent are “independent” effects? relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 44 (11), 1223-1231
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90155-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- CORRECTION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION RELATIVE RISK ESTIMATES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR MEASUREMENT ERROR: THE CASE OF MULTIPLE COVARIATES MEASURED WITH ERRORAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1990
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease *1Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasThe Lancet, 1990
- Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within‐person measurement errorStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- ESTIMATING AND CORRECTING FOR CONFOUNDER MISCLASSIFICATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- MEASUREMENT ERROR AND ITS IMPACT ON PARTIAL CORRELATION AND MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- CONFOUNDING AND MISCLASSIFICATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Methodological Issues in Case-Control Studies III:—The Effect of Joint Misclassification of Risk Factors and Confounding Factors upon Estimation and PowerInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1984
- THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COVARIATESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980
- Regression Estimation After Correcting for AttenuationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- Spurious effects from an extraneous variableJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1966