LIBERALISM, SOCIAL DEMOCRACY AND THE VALUE OF PROPERTY UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International & Comparative Law Quarterly
- Vol. 59 (4), 1055-1078
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589310000448
Abstract
In most of Europe, expropriation must comply with the standards set under European human rights law. Article 1 of the First Protocol (‘P1-1’) to the European Convention on Human Rights declares that ‘every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.’ The European Court of Human Rights has stated that the right would be ‘largely illusory and ineffective’ if it did not guarantee full compensation in all but exceptional circumstances.1It is quite clear, however, that this was not the belief of at least some of the States that had signed it when it came into force in 1954. P1-1 makes no reference to compensation. An interference must be lawful, and in the public or general interest, but there is nothing that expressly requires compensation. Nevertheless, the Court has declared that any interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a ‘‘fair balance’ between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights’,2and this means that expropriation without compensation that is reasonably related to the value of the property would normally violate the owner's rights under P1-1.3Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- ItalyEuropean Constitutional Law Review, 2008
- Expropriation without Compensation – the European Court of Human Rights sanctions German Legislation expropriating the Heirs of “New Farmers”German Law Journal, 2005
- The Conflict over Property Rights during the Second World War: The Labour Party's Abandonment of Land NationalizationTwentieth Century British History, 2003
- Labour revisionism and public ownership, 1951–63Contemporary Record, 1991
- The United Kingdom Nationalization Cases and the European Convention on Human RightsThe British Yearbook of International Law, 1987
- International Law and the Valuation of Nationalised Shares: Two French DecisionsInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1985
- Compensation for Takings: An Economic AnalysisCalifornia Law Review, 1984
- The Protection of the Right of Property of Nationals under the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human RightsThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1964
- The British Labor Government's Town and Country Planning Act: A Study in Conflicting LiberalismsPolitical Science Quarterly, 1951
- The Scott and Uthwatt Reports on Land UtilisationThe Economic Journal, 1943