Best Practices in Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Comparison of Regional Practice Patterns
- 1 May 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 83 (5), 1060-1064
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shock Wave Lithotripsy Associated With Greater Prevalence of HypertensionUrology, 2011
- Improved cost‐effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shockwave delivery rateBJU International, 2010
- Shock Wave Lithotripsy Not Associated With Development of Diabetes Mellitus at 6 Years of Follow-upUrology, 2009
- Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy‐induced lesion size during step‐wise voltage rampingBJU International, 2008
- Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptorsBJU International, 2008
- Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones Is Not Associated with Hypertension and Diabetes MellitusUrology, 2008
- Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave deliveryBJU International, 2007
- Prevention of Lithotripsy-Induced Renal Injury by Pretreating Kidneys with Low-Energy Shock WavesJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation?Urology, 1999
- Pathologic effects of ESWL on canine renal tissueUrology, 1987