New insights into the noise reduction Wiener filter
- 19 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
- Vol. 14 (4), 1218-1234
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tsa.2005.860851
Abstract
The problem of noise reduction has attracted a considerable amount of research attention over the past several decades. Among the numerous techniques that were developed, the optimal Wiener filter can be considered as one of the most fundamental noise reduction approaches, which has been delineated in different forms and adopted in various applications. Although it is not a secret that the Wiener filter may cause some detrimental effects to the speech signal (appreciable or even significant degradation in quality or intelligibility), few efforts have been reported to show the inherent relationship between noise reduction and speech distortion. By defining a speech-distortion index to measure the degree to which the speech signal is deformed and two noise-reduction factors to quantify the amount of noise being attenuated, this paper studies the quantitative performance behavior of the Wiener filter in the context of noise reduction. We show that in the single-channel case the a posteriori signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (defined after the Wiener filter) is greater than or equal to the a priori SNR (defined before the Wiener filter), indicating that the Wiener filter is always able to achieve noise reduction. However, the amount of noise reduction is in general proportional to the amount of speech degradation. This may seem discouraging as we always expect an algorithm to have maximal noise reduction without much speech distortion. Fortunately, we show that speech distortion can be better managed in three different ways. If we have some a priori knowledge (such as the linear prediction coefficients) of the clean speech signal, this a priori knowledge can be exploited to achieve noise reduction while maintaining a low level of speech distortion. When no a priori knowledge is available, we can still achieve a better control of noise reduction and speech distortion by properly manipulating the Wiener filter, resulting in a suboptimal Wiener filter. In case that we have multiple microphone sensors, the multiple observations of the speech signal can be used to reduce noise with less or even no speech distortionKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating Cepstrum of Speech Under the Presence of Noise Using a Joint Prior of Static and Dynamic FeaturesIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2004
- Signal enhancement using beamforming and nonstationarity with applications to speechIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2001
- Speech enhancement based on the subspace methodIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2000
- Signal/noise KLT based approach for enhancing speech degraded by colored noiseIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2000
- HMM-based strategies for enhancement of speech signals embedded in nonstationary noiseIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1998
- Iterative and sequential Kalman filter-based speech enhancement algorithmsIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1998
- A signal subspace approach for speech enhancementIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1995
- Reduction of broad-band noise in speech by truncated QSVDIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 1995
- A Bayesian estimation approach for speech enhancement using hidden Markov modelsIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1992
- Filtering of colored noise for speech enhancement and codingIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1991