Systematic review: the presenting international normalised ratio (INR) as a predictor of outcome in patients with upper nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding
- 8 March 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 33 (9), 1010-1018
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04618.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2010
- Management of Acute Bleeding from a Peptic UlcerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A Sampling of Canadian Practice in Managing Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding before Recent Guideline Publication: Is there Room for Improvement?Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005
- The Canadian Registry on Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Endoscopy (RUGBE): Endoscopic Hemostasis and Proton Pump Inhibition are Associated with Improved Outcomes in a Real-Life SettingThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004
- Early Intensive Resuscitation of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Decreases MortalityThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004
- Consensus Recommendations for Managing Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Acute Upper Gi Bleeding: Did Anything Change?The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelinesGut, 2002
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Prospective evaluation of the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after admission to a medical intensive care unitAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1984