Understanding the impact of pre-analytic variation in haematological and clinical chemistry analytes on the power of association studies
Open Access
- 31 July 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 43 (5), 1633-1644
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu127
Abstract
Background: Errors, introduced through poor assessment of physical measurement or because of inconsistent or inappropriate standard operating procedures for collecting, processing, storing or analysing haematological and biochemistry analytes, have a negative impact on the power of association studies using the collected data. A dataset from UK Biobank was used to evaluate the impact of pre-analytical variability on the power of association studies. Methods: First, we estimated the proportion of the variance in analyte concentration that may be attributed to delay in processing using variance component analysis. Then, we captured the proportion of heterogeneity between subjects that is due to variability in the rate of degradation of analytes, by fitting a mixed model. Finally, we evaluated the impact of delay in processing on the power of a nested case-control study using a power calculator that we developed and which takes into account uncertainty in outcome and explanatory variables measurements. Results: The results showed that (i) the majority of the analytes investigated in our analysis, were stable over a period of 36 h and (ii) some analytes were unstable and the resulting pre-analytical variation substantially decreased the power of the study, under the settings we investigated. Conclusions: It is important to specify a limited delay in processing for analytes that are very sensitive to delayed assay. If the rate of degradation of an analyte varies between individuals, any delay introduces a bias which increases with increasing delay. If pre-analytical variation occurring due to delays in sample processing is ignored, it affects adversely the power of the studies that use the data.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- What makes UK Biobank special?The Lancet, 2012
- DataSHIELD: resolving a conflict in contemporary bioscience--performing a pooled analysis of individual-level data without sharing the dataInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assaysClinical Biochemistry, 2010
- Recommandations préanalytiques pour les analyses de protéomique clinique des fluides biologiquesAnnales de biologie clinique, 2009
- Human Biospecimen Research: Experimental Protocol and Quality Control ToolsCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2009
- Stability of plasma analytes after delayed separation of whole blood: implications for epidemiological studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- The detection of gene–environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Biological sample collection and processing for molecular epidemiological studiesMutation research. Reviews in mutation research, 2003
- Variance components analysis for pedigree-based censored survival data using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and Gibbs sampling in BUGSGenetic Epidemiology, 2000
- Genetic variance components analysis for binary phenotypes using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and Gibbs samplingGenetic Epidemiology, 1999