Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients’ understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings
- 21 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 80 (5), 1010-1020
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12716
Abstract
The aim was to evaluate the comprehension of participants of an improved informed consent document (ICD). This was a randomized controlled French multicentre study performed in real conditions. Participants were adult patients undergoing screening for enrolment in biomedical research studies, who agreed to answer a validated questionnaire evaluating objective and subjective comprehension scored from 0 (no comprehension) to 100 (excellent comprehension). Patients were provided either the original ICD or an ICD modified in terms of structure and readability. The primary end point was the score of objective comprehension. The secondary end-points were the enrolment rate in the clinical study and patient characteristics associated with the score of objective comprehension. Four hundred and eighty-one patients were included, 241 patients in the original ICD group and 240 patients in the modified ICD group. There was no difference between the two groups for the score of objective comprehension (original ICD 72.7 (95% CI 71.3, 74.1) vs. modified ICD 72.5 (95% CI 71.0, 74.0); P = 0.81). However, the rate of enrolment in the clinical study was lower in the group who received the modified ICD (64.4% (95% CI 58.3, 70.5)) than for the original ICD (73.0% (95% CI 67.4, 78.7)) (P = 0.042). Only female gender and high educational level were associated with a better objective comprehension. Improving ICDs had no effect on participants' understanding, whereas the rate of enrolment was lower in this group. In attempts at improving potential participants' understanding of clinical research information, efforts and future trials should focus on other ways to improve comprehension.Funding Information
- French Ministry of health – Programme for Hospital Clinical Research (PHRC)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trialsBMC Medical Ethics, 2013
- Interactive Informed Consent: Randomized Comparison with Paper ConsentsPLOS ONE, 2013
- A Booklet on Participants’ Rights to Improve Consent for Clinical Research: A Randomized TrialPLOS ONE, 2012
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Short and Standard-Length Consent Forms for a Genetic Cohort Study: Is Longer Better?Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Informed consent document improvement does not increase patients' comprehension in biomedical researchBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2010
- Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?The American Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Information Sheets and Informed Consent Forms for Clinical Study Participants: Towards Standardised Recommendations?Therapies, 2009
- Impact of French 'Comites de Protection des Personnes' on the readability of informed consent documents (ICD) in biomedical research: more information, but not better informationFundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2005
- Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for ResearchJAMA, 2004
- Improving Understanding of Research Consent Disclosures Among Persons With Mental IllnessPsychiatric Services, 2001