What is Religion?
- 4 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Brill in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
- Vol. 26 (3), 246-286
- https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341320
Abstract
Religious studies cannot agree on a common definition of its subject matter. To break the impasse, important insights from recent discussions about post-foundational political theory might be of some help. However, they can only be of benefit in conversations about “religion” when the previous debate on the subject matter of religious studies is framed slightly differently. This is done in the first part of the article. It is, then, shown on closer inspection of past discussions on “religion” that a consensus-capable, contemporary, everyday understanding of “religion,” here called Religion 2, is assumed, though it remains unexplained and unreflected upon. The second part of the article shows how Religion 2 can be newly conceptualized through the lens of Ernesto Laclau’s political theory, combined with concepts from Judith Butler and Michel Foucault, and how Religion 2 can be established as the historical subject matter of religious studies. Though concrete historical reconstructions of Religion 2 always remain contested, I argue that this does not prevent it from being generally accepted as the subject matter of religious studies. The third part discusses the previous findings in the light of postcolonial concerns about potential Eurocentrism in the concept of “religion.” It is argued that Religion 2 has to be understood in a fully global perspective, and, as a consequence, more research on the global religious history of the 19th and 20th centuries is urgently needed. Religious studies cannot agree on a common definition of its subject matter. To break the impasse, important insights from recent discussions about post-foundational political theory might be of some help. However, they can only be of benefit in conversations about “religion” when the previous debate on the subject matter of religious studies is framed slightly differently. This is done in the first part of the article. It is, then, shown on closer inspection of past discussions on “religion” that a consensus-capable, contemporary, everyday understanding of “religion,” here called Religion 2, is assumed, though it remains unexplained and unreflected upon. The second part of the article shows how Religion 2 can be newly conceptualized through the lens of Ernesto Laclau’s political theory, combined with concepts from Judith Butler and Michel Foucault, and how Religion 2 can be established as the historical subject matter of religious studies. Though concrete historical reconstructions of Religion 2 always remain contested, I argue that this does not prevent it from being generally accepted as the subject matter of religious studies. The third part discusses the previous findings in the light of postcolonial concerns about potential Eurocentrism in the concept of “religion.” It is argued that Religion 2 has to be understood in a fully global perspective, and, as a consequence, more research on the global religious history of the 19th and 20th centuries is urgently needed.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner's Genealogical TurnJournal of the History of Ideas, 2012
- Why Critique?Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 2012
- Conceptualizing religion: Some recent reflectionsReligion, 2008
- Dislodging "Embedded" Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly TropeNumen, 2008
- Words, Words, WordsJournal of the American Academy of Religion, 2007
- Ideology and post-MarxismJournal of Political Ideologies, 2006
- Problems With the Family Resemblance Approach To Conceptualizing ReligionMethod & Theory in the Study of Religion, 2000
- Prototypes: Western or Cross-Cultural?1Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 2000
- Taming Ethnocentrism and Trans-Cultural Understandings1Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 2000
- Review Symposium: Benson Saler's Conceptualizing Religion the Definition of Religion: an Analytical or Hermeneutical Task?Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 2000