Prospective Comparison of Valve Regurgitation Quantitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vol. 6 (1), 48-57
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.112.975623
Abstract
Background— Both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allow quantification of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR). We hypothesized that CMR measurement of regurgitant volume (RVol) is more reproducible than TTE. Methods and Results— TTE and CMR performed on the same day in 57 prospectively enrolled adults (31 with AR, 26 with MR) were measured by 2 independent physicians. TTE RVolAR was calculated as Doppler left ventricular outflow minus inflow stroke volume. RVolMR was calculated by both the proximal isovelocity surface area method and Doppler volume flow at 2 sites. CMR RVolAR was calculated by phase-contrast velocity mapping at the aortic sinuses and RVolMR as total left ventricular minus forward stroke volume. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were similar. For AR, the Bland–Altman mean interobserver difference in RVol was −0.7 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], −5 to 4) for CMR and −9 mL (95% CI, −53 to −36) for TTE. The Pearson correlation was higher (P=0.001) between CMR (0.99) than TTE readers (0.89). For MR, the Bland–Altman mean difference in RVol between observers was −4 mL (95% CI, −21 to 13) for CMR compared with 0.7 mL (95% CI, −30 to 32) for the proximal isovelocity surface area and −10 mL (95% CI, −76 to 56) for TTE volume flow at 2 sites. Correlation was similar for CMR (0.94) versus TTE readers (0.90 for the proximal isovelocity surface area). Conclusions— Compared with TTE, CMR has lower intraobserver and interobserver variabilities for RVolAR, suggesting CMR may be superior for serial measurements. Although RVolMR is similar by TTE and CMR, variability in measured RVol by both approaches suggests that caution is needed in clinical practice.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Valvular Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2009
- Effect of Dynamic Flow Rate and Orifice Area on Mitral Regurgitant Stroke Volume Quantification Using the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area MethodJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Quantitative Assessment of Severity of Mitral Regurgitation by Serial Echocardiography in a Multicenter Clinical Trial of Percutaneous Mitral Valve RepairThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2007
- ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2006
- Quantitative Determinants of the Outcome of Asymptomatic Mitral RegurgitationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Color flow imaging of the vena contracta in mitral regurgitation: technical considerationsJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2003
- Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiographyJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2003
- Quantification of mitral regurgitation by velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imagingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Doppler echocardiographic findings in adults with severe symptomatic valvular aortic stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window.Circulation, 1984