Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science
- 1 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Biological Conservation
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- NASA (NNX14AC36G)
- USFWS
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making inference with messy (citizen science) data: when are data accurate enough and how can they be improved?Ecological Applications, 2019
- Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivationsBiodiversity and Conservation, 2017
- Troubling issues at the frontier of animal tracking for conservation and managementConservation Biology, 2017
- Learning and the transformative potential of citizen scienceConservation Biology, 2016
- Citizen Science as an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and EvidenceEcosystems, 2015
- Sharing data while protecting privacy in citizen scienceInteractions, 2014
- Collaboration in natural resource governance: Reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in ScotlandJournal of Environmental Management, 2012
- The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagementFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012
- Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case studyConservation Letters, 2011
- Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USAEcology and Society, 2008