Strategic Process Research: Questions and Recommendations
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 8 (4), 565-575
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284655
Abstract
The characteristics of the two most frequently cited types of strategy formulation models are compared to illustrate their major differences. A number of research issues emerge. Additional research issues then are identified in a review of literature that has raised questions about the most common model. Recommendations are provided in an attempt to help investigators pursue these and other strategic process questions.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance and consensusStrategic Management Journal, 1980
- Organizational BehaviorAnnual Review of Psychology, 1979
- Managerial Problem Solving Models: A Review and a ProposalAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- A Contextual Model of Strategic Decision Making in Organizations.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1977
- Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of actionOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- The foreign investment decision processThe International Executive, 1966
- On the Concept of Organizational GoalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1964
- The Analysis of Goals in Complex OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1961
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959