Perceptions of the Nature and ‘Goodness’ of Argument among College Students, Science Teachers, and Scientists
- 10 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Science Education
- Vol. 33 (4), 573-605
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003677889
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate college freshmen science students, secondary science teachers, and scientists' perceptions of ‘scientific’ argument; to compare participants' perceptions with Stephen Toulmin's analytical framework of argument; and to characterize the criteria that participants deployed when assessing the ‘quality’ or ‘goodness’ of arguments. Thirty students, teachers, and scientists—with 10 members in each group—participated in two semi‐structured individual interviews. During the first interview, participants generated an argument in response to a socioscientific issue. In the second interview, each participant ‘evaluated’ three arguments generated by a member from each participant group without being privy to the arguer's group membership. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed. The findings point to both similarities and differences between participants' conceptions of argument and those based on Toulmin's analytical framework. Participants used an array of common and idiosyncratic criteria to judge the quality or goodness of argument. Finally, contrary to expectations, participants independently agreed that the ‘best’ arguments were those generated by participant science teachers.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Argumentative Discourse in a High School Chemistry ClassroomSchool Science and Mathematics, 2006
- Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planningInternational Journal of Science Education, 2005
- TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourseScience Education, 2004
- Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functionsCognitive Science, 2004
- Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science EducationStudies in Science Education, 2002
- Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIEInternational Journal of Science Education, 2000
- Using Virgil to Analyze Public Policy Arguments: A System Based on Toulmin's Informal LogicSocial Science Computer Review, 1994
- Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade‐10 opticsJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Relevance, warrants, backing, inductive supportArgumentation, 1992
- Situated Cognition and the Culture of LearningEducational Researcher, 1989