Are Participants in a Street-Based HIV Testing Program Able to Perform Their Own Rapid Test and Interpret the Results?
Open Access
- 8 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (10), e46555
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046555
Abstract
Availability of over-the-counter rapid HIV tests could improve access to testing those reluctant or unable to use current services. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of HIV self-testing using a finger-stick whole-blood rapid test (Determine™ HIV Combo) to detect both antigen and antibody. Before being tested, 313 participants in a street-based testing program were given adapted instructions and a test kit, and performed the self-test without supervision. These participants, together with another 207 who performed supervised self-testing, received additional instructions on how to interpret the test results shown in six colour photos and filled out a questionnaire. Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used in the statistical analysis. About 8.0% (95%CI:4.8%–11.2%) obtained an invalid self-test. An invalid result was inversely associated with male participants who had sex with men (OR = 0.3;95%CI:0.1–1.0). Of the 3111 photos interpreted,4.9% (95%CI:4.1–5.7) were incorrect. Only 1.1% (95%CI:0.3–1.8) of the positive results were interpreted as negative. Age 30 or older (OR = 2.1; 95%CI:1.2–3.7), having been born in Latin America (OR = 1.6; 95%CI:1.1–2.2),and not having university education (OR = 2.1;95%CI:1.2–3.7) were associated with misinterpreting test results in the GEE. Participant's perceptions of both their proficiency when conducting the test and interpretation were related with actual outcomes. Most participants (83.9%) were more motivated than before to use the self-test in the future, and 51.7% would pay >10 Euros for the test if it was sold in pharmacies. This is the first study showing that blood-based self-testing with current technology is feasible in HIV-negative participants demanding the test and without prior training or supervision. Bearing in mind that it was conducted under difficult weather conditions and using a complex kit, over-the-counter tests could be a feasible option to complement current diagnostic strategies. More studies are needed to accommodate technology, minimise interpretation mistakes and provide on-line support.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection of Acute HIV Infection: A Field Evaluation of the Determine® HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo TestThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2011
- The Uptake and Accuracy of Oral Kits for HIV Self-Testing in High HIV Prevalence Setting: A Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study in Blantyre, MalawiPLoS Medicine, 2011
- User Acceptability and Feasibility of Self-Testing With HIV Rapid TestsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2007
- HIV self-testing: a time to revise current policyThe Lancet, 2007
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings.Published by H1 Connect ,2006
- Rapid HIV Testing at Home: Does It Solve a Problem or Create One?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USAAIDS, 2006
- Self-testing for HIV: a new option for HIV prevention?The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2004
- What happened to home HIV test collection kits? Intent to use kits, actual use, and barriers to use among persons at risk for HIV infectionAIDS Care, 2002
- Home HIV testing: why not in Canada?2000