Validity and reproducibility of a physical activity questionnaire for older adults: questionnaire versus accelerometer for assessing physical activity in older adults
Open Access
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 4 (1), 171-180
- https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S30848
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) is important in older adults for the maintenance of functional ability. Assessing PA may be difficult. Few PA questionnaires have been compared to activity monitors. We examined reproducibility and validity of the self-administered Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ) against a triaxial accelerometer (ACTR) (Sensewear® Pro) in older adults. Methods: Participants wore the ACTR continuously for two weeks. After 2 (T [time] = 1) and 4 (T = 2) weeks, participants completed the LAPAQ. Since the LAPAQ asks about 2 weeks’ worth of physical activity, the ACTR and LAPAQ coincided at T1. T2 was used to assess the reproducibility of the LAPAQ results only. We calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients (PCC) to examine reproducibility and validity. For visualization, we used scatterplots and Bland–Altman plots. With a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve we assessed how well the LAPAQ identifies older adults whose activity level is below official recommendations. Results: A total of 89 persons were included. Of the participants, 48% were men; median age was 73, and median body mass index was 25. The 2-week mean total duration of activity was 2788 (ACTR, T = 1), 2439 (LAPAQ T = 1), and 1994 (LAPAQ T = 2) minutes. As a reference, 2 full weeks contained 20,160 minutes. Reproducibility of the LAPAQ was moderate (PCC 0.68, 95% CI 0.55–0.80). The median difference between LAPAQ at T = 1 and the ACTR (LAPAQ minus ACTR) was –510 minutes and the PCC was 0.25 (95% CI 0.07–0.44). The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 (95% CI 0.59–0.86). Conclusion: LAPAQ underestimates PA and seems unsuitable for exact measurement in older adults. However, it may be used to determine if a person’s PA level is below the recommended level.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for AdultsInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2010
- Physical Activity and Clinical and Functional Status in COPDChest, 2009
- Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires?The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008
- Regular Physical Activity Modifies Smoking-related Lung Function Decline and Reduces Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort studyThorax, 2006
- Health benefits of physical activity: the evidenceCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Interventions for promoting physical activityCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Quantifying energy expenditure and physical activity in the context of dose responseMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Physical activity assessment: A review of methodsCritical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1996
- Relationship of Health Behaviours to Five-year Mortality in an Elderly CohortAge and Ageing, 1995