Factors enhancing market participation by small-scale cotton farmers
Open Access
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Agrekon
- Vol. 47 (4), 451-469
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2008.9523810
Abstract
This paper uses data collected from 177 small-scale farming households in Mpumalanga in an effort to identify factors that significantly influence the degree of commercialisation or market participation. A logistic regression model was applied within the transaction costs framework. Results support the hypothesis that transactions costs rank among the main determinants of commercialisation. The following variables were statistically significant: age, ability to speak/understand English, region, ownership of transport, access to market information, distance to market, dependency ratio, trust, land size and ownership of livestock. Increases in the latter four have negative effects on commercialisation. The negative relationship between land size and commercialisation probably indicates that increased market participation is also afunction of input (land) productivity.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social capital and farming at the rural–urban interface: the importance of nonfarmer and farmer relationsAgricultural Systems, 2003
- Policy options promoting market participation among smallholder livestock producers: a case study from the PhillipinesFood Policy, 2003
- Transaction costs and crop marketing in the communal areas of Impendle and Swayimana, KwaZulu-NatalDevelopment Southern Africa, 2001
- COMMERCIALIZATION AS A STRATEGY FOR RECONSTRUCTION IN AGRICULTURE / KOMMERSIALISASIE AS 'N STRATEGIE VIR REKONSTRUKSIE IN DIE LANDBOUAgrekon, 1996
- Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit ModelsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1984
- Cattle as a Store of Wealth in Swaziland: Implications for Livestock Development and Overgrazing in Eastern and Southern AfricaAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979