Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Health Economics, Policy and Law
- Vol. 5 (3), 269-293
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133110000034
Abstract
Industrialised countries face similar challenges for improving the performance of their health system. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the reforms required are largely determined by each country’s basic social security model. Most reforms in Beveridge-type systems have sought to increase choice and reduce waiting times while those in major Bismarck-type systems have focused on cost control by constraining the choice of providers. This paper looks at the main differences in performance of five countries and reviews their recent reform experience, focusing on three questions: Are there systematic differences in performance of Beveridge and Bismarck-type systems? What are the key parameters of healthcare system, which underlie these differences? Have recent reforms been effective?Our results do not suggest that one system-type performs consistently better than the other. In part, this may be explained by the heterogeneity in organisational design and governance both within and across these systems. Insufficient attention to those structural differences may explain the limited success of a number of recent reforms. Thus, while countries may share similar problems in terms of improving healthcare performance, adopting a ‘copy-and-paste’ approach to healthcare reform is likely to be ineffective.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and EnglandHealth Economics, Policy and Law, 2010
- Is Canada odd? A comparison of European and Canadian approaches to choice and regulation of the public/private divide in health careHealth Economics, Policy and Law, 2010
- Have targets done more harm than good in the English NHS? NoBMJ, 2009
- Is choice working for patients in the English NHS?BMJ, 2008
- Consequences of a decentralized healthcare governance model: Measuring regional authority support for patient choice in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and SwedenHealth Economics, Policy and Law, 2007
- WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEMPublic Administration, 2006
- The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in EnglandJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2005
- Measuring health system performanceThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2002
- Maximum waiting time — a threat to clinical freedom?: Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times.Health Policy, 2000