Evaluating the Credibility of Sources: A Missing Link in the Teaching of Critical Thinking
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Teaching of Psychology
- Vol. 22 (1), 39-41
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_12
Abstract
Good decisions depend on starting with good information and then reasoning with it logically. Texts and instruction in courses in critical thinking by philosophers and psychologists focus almost exclusively on how we should reason with information, and they provide little or no help in guiding students toward selecting sources of credible information. I argue that we necessarily depend on others for most of the important information we use and that a major payoff of good education is learning whom to believe. Instruction in criteria to use in selecting valid sources should be an explicit and important part of instruction in critical thinking.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- How mental systems believe.American Psychologist, 1991
- Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Lay Epistemics and Human KnowledgePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1989
- Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981
- Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- A Study of the Anti-Scientific AttitudeScientific American, 1955
- The emotions and the will.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1859