Lost Letter Measure of Variation in Altruistic Behaviour in 20 Neighbourhoods
Open Access
- 15 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (8), e43294
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043294
Abstract
Altruistic behaviour varies across human populations and this variation is likely to be partly explained by variation in the ecological context of the populations. We hypothesise that area level socio-economic characteristics will determine the levels of altruism found in individuals living in an area and we use a lost letter experiment to measure altruism across 20 neighbourhoods with a wide range of income deprivation scores in London, UK. The results show a strong negative effect of neighbourhood income deprivation on altruistic behaviour, with letters dropped in the poorest neighbourhoods having 91% lower odds of being returned than letters dropped in the wealthiest neighbourhoods. We suggest that measures of altruism are strongly context dependant.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Higher social class predicts increased unethical behaviorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- Context Modularity of Human AltruismScience, 2011
- Variation in Cooperative Behaviour within a Single CityPLOS ONE, 2011
- Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: variation and correlations at a city-wide scaleEvolution and Human Behavior, 2009
- Five Rules for the Evolution of CooperationScience, 2006
- Intergroup Conflict: Individual, Group, and Collective InterestsPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2003
- The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000
- Food Sharing on IfalukCurrent Anthropology, 1986
- A Validation of the Lost-Letter TechniquePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1970
- The Lost-Letter Technique: A Tool of Social ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1965