Vaccination, Risks, and Freedom: The Seat Belt Analogy
Open Access
- 22 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Health Ethics
- Vol. 12 (3), 237-249
- https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phz014
Abstract
We argue that, from the point of view public health ethics, vaccination is significantly analogous to seat belt use in motor vehicles and that coercive vaccination policies are ethically justified for the same reasons why coercive seat belt laws are ethically justified. We start by taking seriously the small risk of vaccines’ side effects and the fact that such risks might need to be coercively imposed on individuals. If millions of individuals are vaccinated, even a very small risk of serious side effects implies that, statistically, at some point side effects will occur. Imposing such risks raises issues about individual freedom to decide what risks to take on oneself or on one’s children and about attribution of responsibility in case of adverse side effects. Seat belt requirements raise many of the same ethical issues as vaccination requirements, and seat belt laws initially encountered some opposition from the public that is very similar to some of the current opposition to vaccine mandates. The analogy suggests that the risks of vaccines do not constitute strong enough reasons against coercive vaccination policies and that the same reasons that justify compulsory seat belt use—a measure now widely accepted and endorsed—also justify coercive vaccination policies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Oxford Martin School
- University of Oxford
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford
- Wellcome Centre (203132/Z/16/Z)
- Wellcome Trust (104848/Z/14/Z)
- Children's Research Institute
- Victorian State Government
- Operational Infrastructure Support
- OIS
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groupsBMC Public Health, 2013
- No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccination: a review of international programmesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2011
- Do Decision Biases Predict Bad Decisions? Omission Bias, Naturalness Bias, and Influenza VaccinationMedical Decision Making, 2008
- Do Decision Biases Predict Bad Decisions? Omission Bias, Naturalness Bias, and Influenza VaccinationMedical Decision Making, 2008
- Motorcycle Safety and the Repeal of Universal Helmet LawsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2007
- Availability of Litigation as a Public Health Tool for Firearm Injury Prevention: Comparison of Guns, Vaccines, and Motor VehiclesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2007
- RATIONALIZING VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATIONBioethics, 2007
- GENETIC ENHANCEMENT – A THREAT TO HUMAN RIGHTS?Bioethics, 2007
- Ethical principles for collective immunisation programmesVaccine, 2004
- IMPACT OF SEAT BELT USE ON DRIVING BEHAVIOREconomic Inquiry, 1992